From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:32:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:32:45 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:9902 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 20:32:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:38:34 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Vojtech Pavlik Cc: Jan Dittmer , Linux Kernel List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops on boot with TCQ enabled (VIA KT133A) Message-ID: <20021020003834.GJ871@suse.de> References: <200210190241.49618.jan@jandittmer.de> <20021019091518.GG871@suse.de> <20021019222403.B3018@ucw.cz> <20021019230434.A800@ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021019230434.A800@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 19 2002, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 10:24:03PM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > It's not an oops, and it's not causes by TCQ either. The above is simply > > > a reminder to fix the ide init sequence, because it's probe sequence > > > tries to use drive->disk before it has been set up. That is worked > > > around, but stack is dumped for good measure. So you can feel > > > comfortable using 2.5.44 regardless. > > > > > > But I'm curious about TCQ on your system, since another VIA user > > > reported problems. Does it appear to work for you? > > > > It definitely works on my VIA just fine. > > Famous last words. I tried to play with the /proc using_tcq setting and > got a filesystem corruption immediately. There _may_ be issues with changing depth on the fly. So if you could just test without fiddling with changing depths that would be great. -- Jens Axboe