From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:24:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:24:29 -0400 Received: from smtp.kolej.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.25.225]:25868 "EHLO smtp.kolej.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:23:42 -0400 X-Envelope-From: pavel@bug.ucw.cz Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:38:16 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: george anzinger Cc: Linus Torvalds , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 6 Message-ID: <20021023093815.GB3416@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3DAFB303.4543C579@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DAFB303.4543C579@mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > This patch, in conjunction with the "core" high-res-timers > patch implements high resolution timers on the i386 > platforms. The high-res-timers use the periodic interrupt > to "remind" the system to look at the clock. The clock This scares me: +#define fail_message \ +"High-res-timers: >-<--><-->-<-->-<-->-<--><-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >Failed to find the ACPI pm timer <\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >-<--><-->-<-->-<-->-<-->Boot will fail in Calibrate Delay <\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >Supply a valid default pm timer address <\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >or get your BIOS to turn on ACPI support. <\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >See CONFIGURE help for more information. <\n"\ +"High-res-timers: >-<--><-->-<-->-<-->-<--><-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<-->-<\n" Does that mean our boot has now so much junk in it that we start adding ascii art for "important" messages? Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?