From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, buytenh@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] [RFC] place to put bridge-netfilter specific data in the skbuff
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:22:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021024142234.U2450@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021024.011512.08605370.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:15:12AM -0700
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:15:12AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:16:56 +0200
>
> Mh. Since bridging firewall is cool, but not something everybody will
> use by default [and it adds code as well as enlarges the skb], I think it
> should be a compiletime kernel config option.
>
> This was my initial reaction, but both of us misunderstand what
> is going on I think.
Ok ;)
> If you use bridging, using netfilter on the bridged traffic "is not
> possible" without these bridge-netfilter changes.
>
> So he's saying, if we have bridging enable and netfilter, should
> bridge-netfilter be on, and right now I say yes.
Yes, this does perfectly make sense. This is the way to go.
--
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long
as I'm the dictator." -- George W. Bush Dec 18, 2000
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-24 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-11 22:32 802.1q + device removal causing hang Simon Kirby
2002-09-11 22:31 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-12 6:36 ` [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34 Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-12 23:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 3:20 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-13 4:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 6:12 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-13 6:09 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 12:45 ` bridge-netfilter patch (was: Re: [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.34) Lennert Buytenhek
2002-09-13 18:22 ` bridge-netfilter patch David S. Miller
2002-09-14 7:05 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 3:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:41 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 23:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-17 19:10 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-17 19:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-15 21:27 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2002-09-16 6:50 ` [PATCH] ebtables - Ethernet bridge tables, for 2.5.35 Bart De Schuymer
2002-09-16 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 18:05 ` [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.42 Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 18:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 18:32 ` bert hubert
2002-10-14 18:58 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 19:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-14 19:29 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-14 19:26 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-20 22:20 ` [RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks, vs 2.5.44 Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-20 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-22 23:40 ` Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-25 6:01 ` [PATCH][RFC] bridge-nf -- map IPv4 hooks onto bridge hooks - try 3, " Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-25 6:22 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2002-10-28 13:02 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <200210141953.38933.bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be>
2002-10-14 19:59 ` [RFC] place to put bridge-netfilter specific data in the skbuff Bart De Schuymer
2002-10-24 8:16 ` [netfilter-core] " Harald Welte
2002-10-24 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 12:22 ` Harald Welte [this message]
2002-09-12 23:49 ` 802.1q + device removal causing hang Simon Kirby
2002-09-12 23:53 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021024142234.U2450@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org \
--to=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=bart.de.schuymer@pandora.be \
--cc=buytenh@gnu.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®