mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chrisl@vmware.com
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nakajima,
	Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] How to get number of physical CPU in linux from user space?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:03:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021025200318.GE1397@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1035573689.730.3473.camel@phantasy>

Cool. That will work for me.

Thanks

Chris

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:21:28PM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 15:13, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> > Should this be wrapped in a if (cpu_has_ht(c)) { }  ?
> > Seems silly to be displaying HT information on non-HT CPUs.
> 
> I am neutral, but is fine with me. It is just "cpu_has_ht", btw.
> 
> Take two...
> 
> This displays the physical processor id and number of siblings of each
> processor in /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> 	Robert Love
> 
>  .proc.c.swp |binary
>  proc.c      |    7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -urN linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
> --- linux-2.5.44/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2002-10-19 00:02:29.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2002-10-25 15:18:03.000000000 -0400
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  	 * applications want to get the raw CPUID data, they should access
>  	 * /dev/cpu/<cpu_nr>/cpuid instead.
>  	 */
> +	extern int phys_proc_id[NR_CPUS];
>  	static char *x86_cap_flags[] = {
>  		/* Intel-defined */
>  	        "fpu", "vme", "de", "pse", "tsc", "msr", "pae", "mce",
> @@ -74,6 +75,12 @@
>  	/* Cache size */
>  	if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
>  		seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	if (cpu_has_ht) {
> +		seq_printf(m, "physical processor ID\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
> +		seq_printf(m, "number of siblings\t: %d\n", smp_num_siblings);
> +	}
> +#endif
>  	
>  	/* We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen it or the CPU claims it is internal */
>  	fpu_exception = c->hard_math && (ignore_irq13 || cpu_has_fpu);
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-25 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-25 18:54 Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 19:09 ` [PATCH] " Robert Love
2002-10-25 19:13   ` Dave Jones
2002-01-16 19:35     ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-25 19:21     ` Robert Love
2002-10-25 20:03       ` chrisl [this message]
2002-10-25 21:13   ` Alan Cox
2002-10-25 19:12 ` chrisl
2002-10-25 19:48 [PATCH] " Nakajima, Jun
2002-10-25 20:38 Nakajima, Jun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021025200318.GE1397@vmware.com \
    --to=chrisl@vmware.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome