From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.44-mm5 with contest
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:43:07 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210270943.23074.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Contest results (http://contest.kolivas.net) results for the 2.5.44-mm*
patches:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 74.6 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 75.0 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 76.4 93 0 0 1.05
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 75.0 93 0 0 1.03
2.5.44-mm5 [5] 75.4 91 0 0 1.04
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 90.9 76 32 26 1.25
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 191.5 36 168 64 2.64
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 193.5 38 161 62 2.66
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 191.1 36 166 63 2.63
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 191.4 36 166 63 2.63
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 97.7 80 1 6 1.34
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 99.2 78 1 6 1.37
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 96.9 79 1 5 1.33
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 97.1 79 1 5 1.34
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 97.7 78 1 5 1.34
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 117.0 65 1 7 1.61
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 156.2 49 2 7 2.15
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 176.1 44 2 7 2.42
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 183.3 41 2 8 2.52
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 181.1 44 2 7 2.49
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 873.8 9 69 12 12.03
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 347.3 22 35 15 4.78
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 294.2 28 19 10 4.05
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 358.7 23 25 10 4.94
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 270.7 29 18 11 3.73
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 110.8 68 6 3 1.53
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 110.5 69 7 3 1.52
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 104.5 73 7 4 1.44
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 105.6 71 6 4 1.45
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 103.3 74 6 4 1.42
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 99.1 71 1 21 1.36
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 96.5 74 1 22 1.33
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 94.5 75 1 22 1.30
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 96.4 74 1 21 1.33
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 95.0 75 1 20 1.31
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.44 [3] 114.3 67 30 2 1.57
2.5.44-mm1 [3] 159.7 47 38 2 2.20
2.5.44-mm2 [3] 116.6 64 29 2 1.60
2.5.44-mm4 [3] 114.9 65 28 2 1.58
2.5.44-mm5 [4] 114.1 65 30 2 1.57
Summary: mm5 appears a little faster under IO load, otherwise the same.
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9uxp+F6dfvkL3i1gRAs9AAJ9Msm/69wnFVv2rFIUi08jdAb8QFgCeO7hj
9La9w2ooWhA1qxoB+/OE3+c=
=fWTd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
reply other threads:[~2002-10-26 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210270943.23074.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome