Re: ARGH! (Is there an HTML archive for linux-kernel that patches work from?)

[Hank Leininger <linux-kernel@progressive-comp.com>]

On 2002-10-27, Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org> wrote:

> Marc.theaimsgroup.com has a lovely "raw mode", but it truncates posts
> that are too long.

This is true, and I consider it a bug.  However the limit should be quite
high--either 256KB or 1MB or so.  So raising / eliminating the limit isn't
high on my priority list :-P  Please do let us know (me directly, or
webguy@theaimsgroup.com) if you find other mails that have been truncated
at shorter than this, I'll look into it.

Also, I'm interested in any corner cases where the attachment-parser messes
up--most of all when it fails to make attachments properly downloadable,
but also, to a lesser extent, any predictably readable mime-type, encoding,
etc which it currently doesn't try to print in-line, but could.

> Erich: Could you put your october 25 numa scheduler posting on your
> home page somewhere?  I tried:

> http://home.arcor.de/efocht/patches/01-numa_sched_core-2.5.44-10a.patch

If I've got the right mail, you're after this one, correct?

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103556765829589&w=2

...Which looks complete from here?  That particular patch can be downloaded
directly as:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103556765829589&q=p3

Thanks,

Hank Leininger <hlein@progressive-comp.com>