From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:13:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:13:24 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:2507 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 17:13:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:19:54 +0100 From: bert hubert To: Jon Portnoy Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) Message-ID: <20021102221954.GA10123@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Jon Portnoy , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021102203608.GB731@gallifrey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote: > Why? I have a couple boxes that have GTK and don't have QT. A GTK-based > configuration system would be most useful. > > Diversity and choice are good things. Which is why we should strive to abstract xconfig from the kernel. -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO