mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: A POSIX Linux project?
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 16:31:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021104163113.B13741@munet-d.enel.ucalgary.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DC6FF60.2000100@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:14:40PM -0500

On Nov 04, 2002  18:14 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I wonder if any vendors, or independent groups, would be interested in 
> maintaining a POSIX compliancy patchkit for the Linux kernel?
> 
> IMO such a "POSIX Linux" project would be useful for several reasons. 
>  Overall, I think there is pressure from several directions to get all 
> sorts of POSIX APIs into the kernel.  On occasion, kernel hackers are 
> confronted with a situation where complete POSIX compliancy may mean a 
> compromise in some area, be it performance, security, API issues, code 
> cleanliness issues, etc.  Or simply that the POSIX-related code just 
> isn't ready to be merged into the mainline kernel yet.
> 
> The vendors also benefit by this, because the barrier to entry in 
> POSIX-related cases would be lowered, which would in turn satisfy the 
> demands of customers.  Which would in turn give the mainline kernel all 
> the software engineering benefits that come from a more reasoned and 
> gradual review and merge of new features.
> 
> Does something like this already exist?  This would need to be an open, 
> vendor-neutral project...

What about the existing POSIX test suite from X/Open?  I don't know what
the current license is, but it is certainly freely downloadable from
their website.  However, it is a pain in the a** to set up and run, so
a new version would definitely be welcome.

I would give you a URL, but I don't have access to my mail archives now.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-04 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-04 22:48 [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 22:58 ` Larry McVoy
2002-11-04 23:17   ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 23:14 ` RFC: A POSIX Linux project? Jeff Garzik
2002-11-04 23:31   ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2002-11-04 23:51     ` Jim Freeman
2002-11-05  0:14       ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05  2:01     ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 23:37   ` Rik van Riel
2002-11-05  1:14   ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-04 23:57 ` [ANNOUNCE] Open POSIX Test Suite Christopher Yeoh
2002-11-05  0:44   ` Geoff Gustafson
2002-11-05  2:26     ` Andreas Dilger
2002-11-05  3:35     ` Christopher Yeoh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021104163113.B13741@munet-d.enel.ucalgary.ca \
    --to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®