mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Cleverdon <jamesclv@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: Kswapd madness in 2.4 kernels
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:13:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211051413.00661.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB8C941.DEF1C069@digeo.com>

Status report:

Due to dependencies, I didn't try the two recommended patches alone.  I ran 
Andrea's 2.4.20-pre10aa1 kernel on the test load for one week.  Low memory 
was conserved and kswapd never went out of control.  Presumably, 
05_vm_16_active_free_zone_bhs-1 did the job for buffers, and the inode patch 
continued to work.

Are there any plans on getting these into 2.4.21?


On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:32 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> James Cleverdon wrote:
> >    Andrea_Archangeli-inode_highmem_imbalance.patch    Type: text/x-diff
>
> That's in -aa kernels, is correct and is needed.
>
> >    Andrew_Morton-2.4_VM_sucks._Again.patch    Type: text/x-diff
>
> hmm.  Someone seems to have renamed my nuke-buffers patch ;)
>
> My main concern is that this was a real quickie; it does a very
> aggressive takedown of buffer_heads.  Andrea's kernels contain a
> patch which takes a very different approach.  See
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.20pre
>8aa2/05_vm_16_active_free_zone_bhs-1
>
> I don't think anyone has tried that patch in isolation though...
>
> If nuke-buffers passes testing and doesn't impact performance then
> fine.  A more cautious approach would be to use the active_free_zone_bhs
> patch.  If that proves inadequate then add in the "read" part of
> nuke-buffers. That means dropping the fs/buffer.c part.
> -


On Friday 25 October 2002 09:57 am, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, James Cleverdon wrote:
> > We have some customers with some fairly beefy servers.  They can get the
> > system into an unusable state that has been reported on lkml before.
> >
> > The two attached patches applied to 2.4.19 fix the problem on our test
> > boxes.
> >
> > Are these patches still considered a good idea for 2.4?  Is there
> > something better I should be using?
>
> Yes, these patches are a good idea.  I'm curious why they
> haven't been submitted to Marcelo yet ;)
>
> Rik


-- 
James Cleverdon
IBM xSeries Linux Solutions
{jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com


  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-05 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-25  3:26 James Cleverdon
2002-10-25  4:32 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-05 22:13   ` James Cleverdon [this message]
2002-11-06 11:11     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-06 13:18       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-11-06 16:40         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-10-25 16:57 ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200211051413.00661.jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
    --to=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome