From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 17:57:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211081757.22876.efocht@ess.nec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1036712788.3178.15.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com>
Michael,
thanks for the results, they look really good!
There's a problem with your script for Schedbench: the column labels
are permuted! Instead of
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
you should have
> AvgUser Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys
The numbers make more sense like that ;-)
Could you please send me your script for schedbench?
BTW: the bk repository has now two distinct changesets, one for the
"core" the other one for the initial balancing. Larry McVoy showed me
how to do things right with the names assigned to the changesets.
Thanks!
Regards,
Erich
On Friday 08 November 2002 00:46, Michael Hohnbaum wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 08:34, Erich Focht wrote:
> > in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
> > set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
> > bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
> > (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
...
> Tested this on a 4 node NUMAQ. Worked fine. Results:
>
> $reportbench stock46 sched46
> Kernbench:
> Elapsed User System CPU
> stock46 20.66s 194.062s 53.39s 1197.4%
> sched46 19.988s 191.302s 50.692s 1210.4%
>
> Schedbench 4:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> stock46 27.27 40.64 109.13 0.85
> sched46 23.10 41.32 92.42 0.76
>
> Schedbench 8:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> stock46 39.18 55.12 313.56 1.68
> sched46 34.45 51.24 275.63 2.28
>
> Schedbench 16:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> stock46 56.39 72.44 902.45 5.12
> sched46 56.73 71.31 907.88 4.19
>
> Schedbench 32:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> stock46 90.47 203.28 2895.41 10.39
> sched46 60.95 143.21 1950.72 10.31
>
> Schedbench 64:
> Elapsed TotalUser TotalSys AvgUser
> stock46 105.00 439.04 6720.90 25.02
> sched46 59.07 262.98 3781.06 19.59
>
> The schedbench runs were ran once each. Kernbench is the average of
> 5 runs.
>
> Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 16:34 Erich Focht
2002-11-06 18:10 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-07 23:05 ` Erich Focht
2002-11-07 23:46 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-08 16:57 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2002-11-11 15:13 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-11 15:14 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-12 0:24 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-18 19:40 ` NUMA scheduler BK tree Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-19 16:26 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-19 16:27 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-06 17:39 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-12-18 16:21 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] " Erich Focht
2002-12-18 16:23 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler: cputimes stats Erich Focht
2002-12-20 15:17 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-20 17:44 ` Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (2/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (3/3) Erich Focht
2003-01-04 1:58 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-05 5:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-06 3:58 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-06 6:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-07 2:23 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-07 11:27 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-07 23:35 ` Michael Hohnbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200211081757.22876.efocht@ess.nec.de \
--to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®