mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akira Tsukamoto <at541@columbia.edu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH]  2.5.47 Athlon/Druon, much faster copy_user function
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:50:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021116133839.9FC4.AT541@columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021116193003.A11205@wotan.suse.de>

Hi,

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:30:03 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> mentioned:
> 
> The proper way to save it is to use kernel_fpu_begin()

Thanks! I will look into it. This is what I was looking for.

I been running this kernel with my copy for three days, and never had
oops, but I was really worried.

> > > Also I'm pretty sure that using movntq (= forcing destination out of 
> > > cache) is not a good strategy for generic copy_from_user(). It may 
> > > be a win for the copies in write ( user space -> page cache ),
> > 
> > Yes, that why I included postfetch in the code because movntq does not leave 
> > them in the L2 cache.
> 
> That looks rather wasteful - first force it out and then trying to get it in 
> again. I have my doubts on it being a good strategy for speed.

It tried both, use just normal mov or movq <-> use movntq + postfetch, and the later 
was much much faster, because postfetch needs to read only every 64 bytes.

I will ckeck kernel_fpu_begin() fisrt and if using fpu register is too much
overhead than I will remove them.

Akira



  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-16 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-16  6:53 Akira Tsukamoto
2002-11-16 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-16 18:22   ` Akira Tsukamoto
2002-11-16 18:30     ` Andi Kleen
2002-11-16 18:50       ` Akira Tsukamoto [this message]
2002-11-16 22:23         ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2002-11-16 21:55       ` Akira Tsukamoto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021116133839.9FC4.AT541@columbia.edu \
    --to=at541@columbia.edu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®