From: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
Subject: Re: 2.[45] fixes for design locking bug in wait_on_page/wait_on_buffer/get_request_wait
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 18:23:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211161810.23039.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021116165956.GF31697@dualathlon.random>
On Saturday 16 November 2002 17:59, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hi Andrea,
> Your pausing problem have little to do with the pausing fix, the problem
> for you is the read latency, you're not triggering the race condition
> fixed by the pausing fix so it can't make differences. One of the
> foundamental obstacles to the read latency is the size of the I/O queue,
> factor that is workarounded by the read-latency patch that basically
> bypasses the size of the queue hiding the problem and in turn can't fix
> the write latency with O_SYNC and the read latency during true read aio
> etc...
ok, after some further tests, I think this is _somewhat_ FS dependent. I tried
this with ext2, ext3 (no difference there) and also with ReiserFS and what
must I say, those "Pausings" caused be the write latency doing it with
ReiserFS are alot less than with ext2|ext3 but are still occuring.
There must went in something bullshitty into 2.4.19/2.4.20 that causes those
ugly things because 2.4.18 does not have that problem. This is still why I
don't use any kernels >2.4.18.
After changing elevator things like this:
root@codeman:[/] # elvtune /dev/hda
/dev/hda elevator ID 0
read_latency: 2048
write_latency: 1024
max_bomb_segments: 0
those "pausings" are less worse than before but are still there.
NOTE: Write latency is lower than read latency (it's not a typo :)
ciao, Marc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-16 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-16 16:24 Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-11-16 16:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-16 17:23 ` Marc-Christian Petersen [this message]
2002-11-16 17:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-16 17:43 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-11-16 18:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-16 18:58 Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-11-16 21:55 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-11-17 17:37 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-11-17 19:19 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-11-12 3:57 Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-12 8:50 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-12 18:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-12 19:46 ` Andrew Morton
2002-11-13 0:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-11-13 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200211161810.23039.m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--to=m.c.p@wolk-project.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®