mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Compiling x86 with and without frame pointer
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:55:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021121125554.GA9883@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19005.1037854033@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:47:13PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
 > The conventional wisdom is that compiling x86 without frame pointer
 > results in smaller code.  It turns out to be the opposite, compiling
 > with frame pointers results in a smaller kernel.  gcc version 3.2
 > 20020822 (Red Hat Linux Rawhide 3.2-4).

I've been pushing a forward port of the CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER changes
that went into 2.4 for a while, but Linus hasn't taken them each time.
I'll keep pushing until I get a comment..

		Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-21 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-21  4:47 Keith Owens
2002-11-21  5:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-11-21  9:30   ` David Zaffiro
2002-11-21 19:20     ` Willy Tarreau
2002-11-21 19:32       ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-21 19:41         ` Willy Tarreau
2002-11-21 20:00           ` Doug Ledford
2002-11-25  8:47       ` David Zaffiro
2002-11-25  8:52         ` Willy Tarreau
2002-11-25 14:55           ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-25 15:00         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-11-25 11:57           ` David Zaffiro
2002-11-21 12:55 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2002-11-21 14:46   ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21 17:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-11-21 23:47   ` Rudmer van Dijk
2002-11-25  8:59   ` David Zaffiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021121125554.GA9883@suse.de \
    --to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®