From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:20:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:20:07 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:46727 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:20:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:24:19 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com Subject: Re: [BK-2.5] [PATCH] bootmem crash fix Message-ID: <20021122212419.GY23425@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com References: <200211222005.gAMK5t319194@hera.kernel.org> <20021122.131259.66318468.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021122.131259.66318468.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:12:59PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > __pa(PAGE_OFFSET) is not necessarily the first physical address in > the system either. > I've never seen this even implied to be the case :-) > In any event, it isn't well defined and we should make it > so. Would a first_pfn variable be in order? Bill