mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <poup@poupinou.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	Margit Schubert-While <margit@margit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20 ACPI
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:57:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021123195720.GA310@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021119164550.GQ11952@fs.tum.de>

Hi!

> >...
> > I disagree with you.  It introduces more enhancements,
> > and more bugfix than the current code.  I admit that tt
> > could introduce some news bugs, but in the balance it
> > should be more stable than before.
> >...
> 
> It's not "in the balance". 2.4 is a stable kernel series. The problem is
> that if you switch from one stable kernel series to another
> (e.g. 2.2 -> 2.4) on a production machine you know that you have to
> check whether everything works as before you upgrade your production
> machines. This can take quite some time. Within a stable kernel series
> everything that worked in earlier kernels within this series should work
> in future kernels in this kernel series. Don't forget that e.g. a
> fixed security problem might force people to do a quick upgrade of
> production machines to the latest kernel in this series.

ACPI is marked experimental (and it *is* experimental), if you run it
on production machine you loose.

								Pavel

-- 
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-24 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-19 12:53 Margit Schubert-While
2002-11-19 13:07 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-19 14:27   ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-11-19 16:45     ` Adrian Bunk
2002-11-23 19:57       ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2002-11-25 12:15         ` Dave Jones
2002-11-25 12:37           ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-11-25 16:07         ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-25 16:33           ` John Jasen
2002-11-25 18:12           ` Pavel Machek
2002-11-25 21:34           ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-25 22:26             ` Alan Cox
2002-11-25 23:53             ` Tom Diehl
2002-11-19 17:29     ` Dave Jones
2002-11-19 18:30     ` Dave Jones
2002-11-20  6:37       ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-11-20 10:29         ` Felix Seeger
2002-11-20 15:11           ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-11-20 11:02 Margit Schubert-While
2002-11-20 20:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2002-11-20 22:24 Alan Cox
2002-11-20 19:08 ` Grover, Andrew
2002-11-20 21:47   ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-20 21:59     ` David Woodhouse
2002-11-20 22:34       ` Alan Cox
2002-11-21 13:11       ` Ducrot Bruno
2002-11-21  1:24 Grover, Andrew
2002-11-21  1:45 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-26 11:09 Margit Schubert-While
     [not found] <r1_Pine.LNX.4.44.0211251848000.8602-100000@tigger.rogueind.com>
2002-11-27 19:09 ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021123195720.GA310@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=margit@margit.com \
    --cc=poup@poupinou.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®