From: "Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk" <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ffmpeg-devel] [RFC] benchmark on athlon + intel xeon + Apple G4 + intel p3
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 13:25:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021124.ZaY.84260300@mail.pronto.tv> (raw)
>Intel Pentium III Cu-mine 850MHz (on busy system)
>1. bench: utime=87.380s
>2. bench: utime=87.390s
>3. bench: utime=87.440s
>avg bench: utime=87.403s
humtitim...
trying out on developer.skolelinux.no - a dual P III 997.5MHz (according to /proc/cpuinfo)
machine:
1. bench: utime=75.790s
2. bench: utime=76.570s
3. bench: utime=76.330s
avg. bench: utime=76.230s
>> K7: Hz*s/1000: 76.963
>> G4: Hz*s/1000: 80.223
>> P4: Hz*s/1000: 93.932
> P3: Hz*s/1000: 74.293
P3(2): Hz*s/1000: 76.094
strange... this shows marginally lower performance on mine than yours, but it still beats the
lot, including the Athlon. Can anyone explain this???????????
I beleive there was some talk on lkml about some sort of P4 optimisation (interrupt stuff) that
wasn't enabled on 2.4, but comes along in 2.5. Any ideas??? (I cc:ed the lkml on this one)
>Hmm, P3 seems pretty fast in comparison and this was not tested on high-end
>system but standard Linux 2.4.18, P3 850, i440BX, 256MB SDRAM, 10GB 4200UPM
>HDD with lots of other apps running at the same time.
The system I was testing on had a load of around 1.2 or something, but given it's a system
with quite nice I/O and two 1GHz CPUs, I don't think it was important.
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021124.ZaY.84260300@mail.pronto.tv \
--to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®