From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:30:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:30:13 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:16343 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 18:30:12 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Erlend Aasland Cc: bfennema@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu, dave@trylinux.com, linux_udf@hpesjro.fc.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH 2.5] get rid of CONFIG_UDF_RW (i386) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:51:20 BST." <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:37:04 +1100 Message-Id: <20021203233744.AA03F2C29E@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20021203125120.GA2417@johanna5.ux.his.no> you write: > I noticed that CONFIG_UDF_RW is not used anywhere, so I removed it from all > the defconfigs. But it's used in 2.4.20. It *looks* like it's on by default in 2.5, but I just want the authors to confirm that the option isn't coming back. Ben, Dave? Rusty. > diff -urN linux-2.5.50/arch/i386/defconfig linux-2.5.50-eaa/arch/i386/defconfig > --- linux-2.5.50/arch/i386/defconfig Tue Oct 22 00:13:57 2002 > +++ linux-2.5.50-eaa/arch/i386/defconfig Tue Dec 3 00:48:05 2002 > @@ -804,7 +804,6 @@ > CONFIG_EXT2_FS=y > # CONFIG_SYSV_FS is not set > CONFIG_UDF_FS=y > -# CONFIG_UDF_RW is not set > # CONFIG_UFS_FS is not set > # CONFIG_UFS_FS_WRITE is not set > # CONFIG_XFS_FS is not set > -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.