From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:44:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:44:34 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:8585 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:43:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:50:54 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [pidhash] [0/4] patch series vs. 2.5.50-mm1 Message-ID: <20021205085054.GF9882@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu References: <0212042348.vaibscRdmcpcAbdcfb9d~c3c4bNczcIa15950@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0212042348.vaibscRdmcpcAbdcfb9d~c3c4bNczcIa15950@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:48:27PM -0800, wli@holomorphy.com wrote: [...] Sorry about the misnumbering; there were about half a dozen other pidhashing related things that didn't make the cut (omitted largely due to theoretical issues or not having enough testing bandwidth for tonight's run) along with a fair amount of other non-pidhash-related fat included in the original numbering scheme before the patch series got renumbered and refined down to bits relevant to single maintainers. Some were also excluded due to mutual interference. Bill