From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:12:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:04:10 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:18692 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:57:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:42:03 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Manish Lachwani Cc: "'Jeff Garzik'" , hps@intermeta.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LM sensors into kernel? Message-ID: <20021205104203.GB127@elf.ucw.cz> References: <233C89823A37714D95B1A891DE3BCE5202AB1A69@xch-a.win.zambeel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <233C89823A37714D95B1A891DE3BCE5202AB1A69@xch-a.win.zambeel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > Sometime back, I had put the sensors support in the 2.4.17 SMP kernel. It > did not give me any problems and we have been using it successfully. The > following are some of the details: There's port to 2.5.49 available from lm_sensors website... Seems to work okay. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?