From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: "José Luis Tallón" <jltallon@adv-solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.20: bug with radeonfb
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 01:56:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021215005654.GE27658@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021203004621.00b5a770@mail.adv-solutions.net>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:52:09AM +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> Environment: gcc-2.95.4, latest dev tools from Debian "Sarge"( testing )
> Kernel: 2.4.20 + patch-2.4.20-ac1 from ftp.kernel.org
>...
> "No Go's":
> Radeon M7 AGP:
> - Framebuffer: unreadable output ( did work _perfectly_ with
> Linux-2.4.19 ).
> Looks like there's a bug somewhere in the rendering code( kernel
> autodetects and configures a 175x65 framebuffer, as previously):
> output seems to be "misplaced" -- might be a little assumption when
> calculating line offsets.
> Text lines, although bent to the right( 60º angle or so ), look _extremely
> long_ (might be a wrong appreciation)
> "Tux" logo is unrecogniceable too :(
>
> - DRM 4.1( v20020828 ) works nicely with XFree 4.2.1
> - Xvid extension works
>
> dmesg gives this ( double-checked with 2.4.19 ): relevant sections are
> identical to 2.4.19
> ---
> Pentium 4 Mobility - stepping 04
> [...]
> ref_clk=2700, ref_div=12, xclk=16600 from BIOS
> Samsung LTN-1050P1-L02 flatpanel
> DFP 1400x1050 from BIOS
> Radeon M7 LW DDR SGRAM 64MB
> colour framebuffer 175x65
>...
Does it work if you revert the patch against drivers/video/radeonfb.c
that is in -ac?
Does it work in plain 2.4.20 (without the -ac patch)?
> TIA
> Regards,
> J.L.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-15 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-03 0:52 José Luis Tallón
2002-12-15 0:56 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2002-12-15 1:11 ` Kernel for Pentium 4 hyperthreading? Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-15 13:44 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-15 15:07 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-15 15:47 ` Vergoz Michael (SYSDOOR)
2002-12-15 15:58 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-17 19:39 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-15 15:57 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-15 17:40 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2002-12-15 19:17 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-15 11:55 ` Linux-2.4.20: bug with radeonfb - solved José Luis Tallón
2002-12-15 16:19 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021215005654.GE27658@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=jltallon@adv-solutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome