From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 12:40:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212221703070.10806-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>one other thing that would be interesting to test on the osdl machines
>would be the effect of different filesystems.
>
>the origional set of tests were all done on reiserfs, it would be
>interesting to see if there is a difference between it and the others.
The current osdl hardware uses ext3 in the default journalling mode. Trying
different filesystems is something I have had planned for a while. When I get
the hardware sorted out as I need it to do this I will post some results
where comparisons can be made.
See the current specs here:
http://www.osdl.org/projects/ctdevel/results/
Con
>
>David Lang
>
>On 22 Dec 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>> Date: 22 Dec 2002 20:06:51 -0500
>> From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
>> To: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
>> Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest -
>> starvation_limit
>>
>> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:48, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> > osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1
>>
>> Con, curiously, what is this OSDL hardware like?
>>
>> One thing I always liked about your Contest runs were you did them on
>> your home machine, which was presumably fairly run-of-the-mill so we
>> could keep an eye on the low-end desktop machines.
>>
>> Robert Love
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+BmmrF6dfvkL3i1gRApCRAJ96mtrpTCap5JoCQAX6UB3O39y3bgCcDoXM
XMa0Pz9Ldrdir9LQ4Qj83pI=
=CmgE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-23 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-19 23:48 Con Kolivas
2002-12-23 1:06 ` Robert Love
2002-12-23 1:05 ` David Lang
2002-12-23 1:40 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2002-12-23 2:52 ` Robert Love
2002-12-23 1:38 ` Con Kolivas
2002-12-23 1:48 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212231241.01049.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome