From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:53:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:53:57 -0500 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]:52949 "EHLO mailout01.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:53:57 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: WOLK - Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not? Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 22:01:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Marcelo Tosatti MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <200212242200.48479.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi there, is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet? I don't see any reason why this won't make it into mainline! ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/kernels/v2.4/2.4.20pre5aa2/10_get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted-4 ciao, Marc From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:58:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:58:51 -0500 Received: from 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.116]:46235 "EHLO 5-116.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:58:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 00:06:45 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Marc-Christian Petersen cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not? In-Reply-To: <200212242200.48479.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Message-ID: References: <200212242200.48479.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet? My guess is that the author never submitted it for inclusion. Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 06:55:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 06:55:25 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:12048 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 06:55:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:03:41 +0100 From: Hubert Mantel To: Rik van Riel , Marc-Christian Petersen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: get_pid-no-deadlock-and-boosted for mainline? Why not? Message-ID: <20021227120341.GA17560@suse.de> References: <200212242200.48479.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, Germany X-Operating-System: SuSE Linux - Kernel 2.4.19-4GB X-GPG-Key: 1024D/B0DFF780 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Dec 25, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > > is there _any_ reason why below patch isn't merged yet? > > My guess is that the author never submitted it for inclusion. Wrong guess: http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-21/0819.html > Rik -o) Hubert Mantel Goodbye, dots... /\\ _\_v