From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:29:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:29:01 -0500 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:41482 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:29:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 22:37:22 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] make i2c use initcalls everywhere Message-ID: <20021229223722.A10670@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "J.A. Magallon" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021229220436.A11420@lst.de> <20021229222628.GC2259@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021229222628.GC2259@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 11:26:28PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 11:26:28PM +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote: > Wil this reach the i2c maintainer or the next auto-generated patch from i2c > 2.8.x will undo what you do now and will be sized 4Gb ? There is no maintainer for drivers/i2c/. The only updates it every got was me syncinc with their releases and backing out obvious braindamage. > Will this be accepted if I submit it, even independently of the maintainer ? > Because I suppose (???) that maintainer is sending changes and they are going > to trash... Maybe the changes the maintainers of the external i2c code are sending _are_ trash?