From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:43:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:43:26 -0500 Received: from host194.steeleye.com ([66.206.164.34]:13837 "EHLO pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 17:43:26 -0500 Message-Id: <200212292251.gBTMpim12460@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove CONFIG_X86_NUMA In-Reply-To: Message from Christoph Hellwig of "Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:40:51 +0100." <20021229234051.A12535@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 16:51:44 -0600 From: James Bottomley X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org hch@lst.de said: > I already wondered about that, but AFAIK a kernel with X86_NUMAQ set > still boots on a PeeCee, so it's really an option, not a choice. It alters the mflags-y and mcore-y variables in arch/i386/Makefile, so it's one of the subarch choices and thus should really be under the menu options. James