mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@ludicrus.ath.cx>
To: Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh@ihatent.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCMCIA and hermer/orinoco_cs drivers b0rken?
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 23:55:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021230235537.1aa44cae.joshk@ludicrus.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878yy6zqrz.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3549 bytes --]

> Any benefit of using an AP over an ad-hoc network if it's only two or
> three nodes in a room?

Well, the benefit of an AP is slightly more symmetrical and wide
coverage(I _____think_____ - someone PLEASE correct me because I'm quite
unsure) and the range of an ad-hoc network is dependent on the number of
nodes.

So in, like, a living room, Ad-Hoc is probably just as good as using an
AP. But there's really no real advantage between the two. In my
experience using Ad-Hoc I have gotten faster TX rates, mostly because
there's no middle-man.

Still, it's up to you. If you were planning to shell out for an AP I
suggest you just set up a lowend Linux box with hostap driver
(http://hostap.epitest.fi) and use that (add iptables for internet
access, or whatever you like). cheaper and in some cases better.

Regards
-Josh

Rabid cheeseburgers forced Alexander Hoogerhuis<alexh@ihatent.com> to
write this on 31 Dec 2002 06:44:16+0100:	

> "Joshua M. Kwan" <joshk@ludicrus.ath.cx> writes:
> 
> > > Warning: Driver for device eth1 has been compiled with version 14
> > > of Wireless Extension, while this program is using version 13.
> > > Some things may be broken...
> > 
> > First of all, what kernel are you using? That's an ancient version
> > of the WE. If this is 2.4.2[01], download the following diffs from
> > Jean's fine site:
> > 
> > *
> > http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/iw240_we15-6.diff
> > *
> > http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jean_Tourrilhes/Linux/iw241_we16-3.diff
> > 
> 
> No warnings anymore, and it all works. I now have a full 2 yards of
> wireless netowrk and dont have to run a cat5 over to muy couch :)
> 
> Apart from that, Jean Tourrilhes' site was a treasure of HOWTOs and
> FAQs, so I'll spend a lot of time reading up there. Next thing up is
> bluetooth, and the site seems to be the right place for that, too.
> 
> > Next of all, try upgrading the firmware on your card.
> > 
> 
> Went trough the motions of finding NetGears support on this. NetGear
> now officially has landed on my list of gear not to recommend. The
> while sitiation on finding firmware and tools to flash it didn't
> strike me as very orderly, and I ended up using some Dlink tools I
> found through Google to get my card slightly upgraded, but it seemed
> to do the trick. The other Lucent/Orinoco card I had was more simple
> and done in a few minutes.
> 
> > The error writing packet to BAP error always seemed just like a
> > small nuisance to me during large file transfers. It did not
> > correlate with any connectivity problems, so I just commented it out
> > in the orinoco/hermes/orinoco_cs source (it's in one of those
> > files.)
> > 
> 
> I never got to try it on large files, I had a few dozen errors from a
> card idling with no connectivity :)
> 
> > Hope your wireless endeavors succeed - I just spent all week getting
> > hostap_plx to work (and I'm now reaping the benefits because I now
> > have wifi access all over my house) :)
> > 
> 
> Any benefit of using an AP over an ad-hoc network if it's only two or
> three nodes in a room?
> 
> > Regards
> > -Josh
> > 
> 
> mvh,
> A
> -- 
> Alexander Hoogerhuis                               | alexh@ihatent.com
> CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE                          | +47 908 21 485
> "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."  --Scott McNealy
> 


-- 
Joshua Kwan
joshk@mspencer.net
pgp public key at http://joshk.mspencer.net/pubkey_gpg.asc
 
Much of the excitement we get out of our work is that we don't really
know what we are doing.
		-- E. Dijkstra

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2002-12-31  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-12-24 17:10 Alexander Hoogerhuis
2002-12-26  8:34 ` Joshua Kwan
2002-12-30  4:17   ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2002-12-30  8:55     ` Joshua M. Kwan
2002-12-30  9:04       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2002-12-31  5:44       ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2002-12-31  7:55         ` Joshua Kwan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021230235537.1aa44cae.joshk@ludicrus.ath.cx \
    --to=joshk@ludicrus.ath.cx \
    --cc=alexh@ihatent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®