From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:49:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:49:33 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:55488 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 21:49:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 03:57:54 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: lkml , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sparc32 net devices Message-ID: <20030102025754.GJ17053@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030101204954.GD17053@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030101155849.A20852@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030101215949.GG17053@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030101212215.B1006@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030101212215.B1006@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [zaitcev@redhat.com] > > > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 22:59:49 +0100 > > From: Tomas Szepe > > > Here's a first stab then. No need to include sbus devices > > in drivers/net/Kconfig, they're all there already. Unfortunately > > this has to tune a lot of drivers' bus dependencies, I'm quite sure > > I've missed some. > > > config NET_VENDOR_SMC > > bool "Western Digital/SMC cards" > > - depends on NET_ETHERNET > > + depends on NET_ETHERNET && (ISA || MCA || EISA) > > help > > If you have a network (Ethernet) card belonging to this class, say Y > > Looks ok with me. If Dave or Jeff take it for common drivers/net/, > I'm taking arch/sparc part. Thanks. I trust you tried at least to > compile the result :) Oh sure I did :) Good. I've got to hit the hay now, tomorrow I'll put the complete diff together and split it according to what is to be sent to whom. -- Tomas Szepe