From: "arun4linux" <arun4linux@indiatimes.com>
To: "george anzinger" <george@mvista.com>,
"arun4linux" <arun4linux@indiatimes.com>,
"John K Luebs" <jkluebs@luebsphoto.com>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: switching to interrupt contex when no interrupts
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:00:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301021221.RAA22029@WS0005.indiatimes.com> (raw)
Hello,
I used
asm volatile ("int 41");
in my code.
My card's irq number is 9.
I get the error message.
Error: suffix or operabds invalid for 'in'
This is the case, if I change the 41 to 0x29 or 29h.
Where can I get some documentation on using asm?
Warm Regards
Arun
"george anzinger" wrote:
george anzinger wrote:
>
> arun4linux wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > <> > interrupt handler.
> > >>Yes. But my requirement is to force my code to run in interrupt context.
> >
> > <> >
> > You will get a better answer from the list if you describe what you are trying to do (in concrete terms), not how you think you might do it.
> >
> > >>My requirement is to simulate a PCI based controller and its behaviour in software. I knew the different type of interrupts and the timings my device produces.
> >
> > I need to simulate this PCI device, its interrupts in sequence and I have to process them in my driver software.
> >
> > Hope this make sense now.
> >
> > Anyway, my requrirement is to simulate the interrupts and process them in the interrupt context.
> >
> > It would be helpful, if anyone could help me how to do it.
> > My idea is to use task queues and bottom halves for this. But I'd like to get clarified on simulating interrupts (rasing the process/task context to interrupt context) and its consequences.
> >
> Why simulate the interrupts when you can just program them?
> On the x86 machine the "int x" instruction generates an
> interrupt to irq "x"+32. You do need to be in kernel land
> to do this, but then I assume that is not a problem.
Uh, make that "x"-32, i.e. "int 34" give irq 2.
-g
>
> -g
>
> >
> > Thanks & Warm Regards
> > Arun
> >
> > "John K Luebs" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:37:33AM +0530, arun4linux wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to force my kernel module to run at interrupt context at some specific points/time and then come back from interrrupt contex after executing that particular portion of code..
> >
> > You seem to be over complexifying what interrupt context is. It is
> > simply a generic term for a context that executes on account of an
> > architecture interrupt. One is forced to run in interrupt context in an
> > interrupt handler.
> >
> > You "run" in interrupt context by calling request_irq attached to the
> > interrupt line that you are interested in installing a handler for.
> >
> > >
> > > Is it possible?
> >
> > Possibility is undefined here because what you said makes no sense.
> >
> > You will get a better answer from the list if you describe what you are
> > trying to do (in concrete terms), not how you think you might do it.
> >
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
> >
> > Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories from http://www.planetm.co.in
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> George Anzinger george@mvista.com
> High-res-timers:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
> Preemption patch:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at http://email.indiatimes.com
Buy the best in Movies at http://www.videos.indiatimes.com
Now bid just 7 Days in Advance and get Huge Discounts on Indian Airlines Flights. So log on to http://indianairlines.indiatimes.com and Bid Now!
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-02 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 12:30 arun4linux [this message]
2003-01-02 16:30 ` george anzinger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-02 19:05 arun4linux
2002-11-23 20:03 arun4linux
2002-11-23 19:57 arun4linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301021221.RAA22029@WS0005.indiatimes.com \
--to=arun4linux@indiatimes.com \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=jkluebs@luebsphoto.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®