From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:21:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:21:41 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:60420 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:21:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:29:56 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Germaschewski Subject: Re: [PATCH] more procfs bits for !CONFIG_MMU Message-ID: <20030102162956.GB956@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kai Germaschewski References: <20030102000522.A6137@lst.de> <20030101235842.A3044@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030101235842.A3044@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 11:58:42PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Isn't it much nicer to just write this something like > > > > proc-mmu-y = proc_mmu.o > > proc-mmu-n = proc_nommu.o > > > > obj-y += $(proc-mmu-$(CONFIG_MMU)) > > > > instead, and avoid conditionals? > > Could be done. Maybe Kai even has an even nicer generic version? :) Here's my try: Old makefile: proc-objs := inode.o root.o base.o generic.o array.o \ kmsg.o proc_tty.o proc_misc.o kcore.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE),y) proc-objs += proc_devtree.o endif New Makefile: proc-y := proc_mmu.o proc-$(CONFIG_MMU) := proc_nommu.o proc-y += inode.o root.o base.o generic.o array.o \ kmsg.o proc_tty.o proc_misc.o kcore.o proc-$(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE) += proc_devtree.o Untested... Sam