From: Jamie Lokier <lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
To: Wolfgang Fritz <wolfgang.fritz@gmx.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Asterisk] DTMF noise
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:19:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030108221956.GA7507@bjl1.asuk.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1C4872.7080508@gmx.net>
Wolfgang Fritz wrote:
> There exists a long text about DTMF detection somewhere on the net (I
> may have the link in the office but I'm on vacation now). What I
> remember is that a "correct" DTMF detection requires much more computing
> power as the present i4l implementation needs (much longer audio samples
> for the goertzel filter, a larger number of frequencies to check) and a
> standard test procedure with a lot of test cases which are not available
> to mortal humans (audio tapes from Bellcore IIRC)
Take a look at this:
http://www-s.ti.com/sc/psheets/spra096a/spra096a.pdf
It describes an algorithm, plus test results. It was tested on a TI
DSP using those very Bellcore tapes, plus another set of tests, and
passes both tests very well.
Of course your ISDN hardware + phone handset may have much worse
analogue circuitry, but I would hope the Bellcore tapes represent that
to some degree.
Unfortunately, TI have removed the version of their application node
which includes DSP source code. It can be found here instead:
http://sulcata6.cs.ccu.edu.tw/~vlsi/data/c54x/spra096.pdf
I guess if that _exact_ DSP algorithm were recoded in C, you could be
reasonably confident that the C implementation would pass those
Bellcore and MITEL tests with reasonable analogue hardware. That's
probably the best you can do on the digital side.
enjoy,
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-08 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030107140012$1b66@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030107150006$4896@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-01-07 19:08 ` Thomas Tonino
2003-01-07 22:46 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-08 7:51 ` Thomas Tonino
2003-01-08 12:43 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-08 13:04 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-01-08 15:49 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-08 16:30 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-08 19:48 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-01-08 22:19 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-01-09 12:51 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-09 13:31 ` Wolfgang Fritz
2003-01-09 23:32 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-10 6:52 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-01-10 12:42 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-10 12:03 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-08 20:22 ` Thomas Tonino
2003-01-09 12:42 ` David D. Hagood
2003-01-07 13:55 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-01-07 14:49 ` [Asterisk] " Mark Spencer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030108221956.GA7507@bjl1.asuk.net \
--to=lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wolfgang.fritz@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®