From: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another idea for simplifying locking in kernel/module.c
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:18:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301101218.EAA03840@baldur.yggdrasil.com> (raw)
Rusty Russell wrote:
>In message <200301100910.BAA31409@adam.yggdrasil.com> you write:
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>> >In message <200301070219.SAA12905@adam.yggdrasil.com> you write:
>> >> Here is a way to replace all of the specialized "stop CPU"
>> >> locking code in kernel/module.c with an rw_semaphore by using
>> >> down_read_trylock in try_module_get() and down_write when beginning to
>> >> unload the module.
>>
>> >And now you can't modularize netfilter modules.
>>
>> Why not? Last time you went looking in the networking code
>> for an example of something that had to increment a module reference
>> in a context where blocking was not allowed you ended up conceding
>> that you example was incorrect.
>No, you're thinking of the IPv4 stack. I didn't use netfilter as an
>example, because that opens me to "well, FIX NETFILTER then!". If it
>were the only case, it's probably arguable.
>The problems with netfilter modules are exactly why I started looking
>at module locking over two years ago.
>> I just booted my gateway machine to a kernel using my
>> aforemetioned patch and various netfilter modules. I've surfed the
>> web, FTP'ed file and run irc through it. It seems to be okay.
>Sure! That's because the netfilter modules use a horrific hack, by
>keeping their own "usage" counts and then spinning (potentially
>forever) on unload until it hits zero.
[...]
Although I suspect that this could be fixed so that the
spinning is guanteed not to be forever, it happens that my
module_put(), which is the same as your module_put() is non-blocking
(as is my try_module_get(), by the way). So I don't see what the
problem is. You should still be able to call try_module_get and
module_put from an interrupt context.
Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
"Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-10 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-10 12:18 Adam J. Richter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-10 11:16 Adam J. Richter
2003-01-11 3:53 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-10 9:38 Adam J. Richter
2003-01-10 9:10 Adam J. Richter
2003-01-10 9:38 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-10 10:15 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-11 14:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-10 10:11 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-07 8:53 Adam J. Richter
2003-01-09 20:41 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-07 2:19 Adam J. Richter
2003-01-08 11:46 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200301101218.EAA03840@baldur.yggdrasil.com \
--to=adam@yggdrasil.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®