From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:58:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:58:36 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:20104 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:58:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:07:18 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: Derek Atkins Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linus BK tree crashes with PANIC: INIT: segmentation violation Message-ID: <20030110230718.GO10062@louise.pinerecords.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [torvalds@transmeta.com] > > I was hoping for a exact changset, your post didn't seem to be 100% sure. > > Anyway, the one you pinpointed ("Make x86 platform choice strings more > easily selectable" top-of-tree is working), is followed by a patch by > Christop Hellwig ("Missed one 'try_inc_mod_count'") which almost certainly > isn't the cause of your trouble. So I'd like you to go forward a bit. > > For example, if you know that your (2) happens before 2.5.54, then you can > do > > bk clone -ql -rv2.5.54 linux-BK test-tree > bk changes > .. look for the one you already know is ok: it's called > "1.911.13.50" in the full 2.5.54 tree .. Or you can just do everything "by hand" using these two together: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5 ftp://ftp.nl.linux.org/pub/linux/bk2patch/v2.5 -- Tomas Szepe