From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 05:23:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 05:23:10 -0500 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:57362 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 05:23:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 10:31:55 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Kamble, Nitin A" Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: KIRQ Balance Message-ID: <20030111103155.A22580@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Kamble, Nitin A" , Linux Kernel References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from nitin.a.kamble@intel.com on Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:40:31AM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: > Hi Martin, > Would somebody get a chance to try the kirq patch out? If yes, please > let me know, how the patch did on your systems. Did your guys find any > issues with it? I will also appreciate more comments. Where/What is the kirq patch?