From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:54:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:54:54 -0500 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:38028 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:54:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:03:35 +0100 From: Tomas Szepe To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: more thoughts on kernel config organization Message-ID: <20030112100335.GE11450@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030112080406.GA1006@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [rpjday@mindspring.com] > > a couple hours ago, i posted an alternate fs/Kconfig file, but i haven't > seen it appear on the mailing list. is there a size limit for postings? > is there another way to make it available for anyone who wants to check > it out? Make the re-arranged Kconfig a unidiff against latest bk, check that everything compiles as expected and send it here. If the diff turns out large (it probably will), gzip it. -- Tomas Szepe