From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:09:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:09:46 -0500 Received: from relay04.roc.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.37]:61092 "EHLO relay04.roc.frontiernet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:09:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:18:36 -0500 From: Scott McDermott To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: console framebuffer scrolling speed Message-ID: <20030113221836.B9108@newbox.localdomain> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mgjohn@u.washington.edu on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:24:25PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org M. Johnson on Fri 10/01 22:24 -0800: > When using the unaccelerated framebuffer console, the speed of > scrolling up in programs like less and vi is much, much slower than > the speed of scrolling down, which makes these programs unusable on > slower computers. > > Does anyone know why this is, or how easily it can be fixed? you are using vesafb? turn off ywrap, turn on mtrr