From: Kronos <kronos@kronoz.cjb.net>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:49:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030114174911.GA796@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301132232.BAA09527@sex.inr.ac.ru>
Il Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:32:56AM +0300, Alexey N. Kuznetsov ha scritto:
> Which does not matter at all, because the hole
>
> void cleanup_module(void)
> {
> <an instance is cloned here>
> unregister_qdisc(&cbq_qdisc_ops);
> }
>
> remained in any case, be it under some preemptive, nonprepemtive lock or
> not under a lock at all.
Hmm, this can't happen now. The try_module_get() will fail if the module
is going away and so qdisc_create won't create a new qdisc.
> BTW, Rusty, a question... I do not understand, what is purpose of this
> "new" module stuff at all?
The idea is to use try_module_get() before using any interface
registered by the module. Every module has a state associated to it: if
the module has been loaded but it is still in its init section its
state will be MODULE_STATE_COMING (and try_module_get() will fail);
if the module is in process of being unloaded its state will be
MODULE_STATE_LIVE (and try_module_get() will fail); otherwise the state
will be MODULE_STATE_LIVE (and try_module_get() will success).
If we use try_module_get() before using the module and module_put() when
we are done everything will work:
int create_foo(foo **new) {
if (try_module_get(foo->owner) == 0)
/* Module is being unloaded, it's not safe to use it */
return -ENOSYS;
*new = foo->new_foo();
}
void destroy_foo(foo *foo) {
foo->finalize();
module_put(foo->owner);
}
This is what I've done for the packet scheduler: try_module_get() is
called *before* cloning the qdisc and if it fails the qdisc won't be
cloned. module_put() is called in qdisc_destroy(), after ->destroy(),
when we are sure that nobody will ever use a reference to the qdisc.
Luca
--
Reply-To: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net
Home: http://kronoz.cjb.net
Non capisco tutta questa eccitazione per il Multitasking:
io sono anni che leggo in bagno.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-14 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-02 22:50 Kronos
2003-01-03 5:10 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-03 8:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-04 6:09 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-04 16:21 ` Kronos
2003-01-13 22:32 ` kuznet
2003-01-13 23:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-14 17:49 ` Kronos [this message]
2003-01-15 0:21 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-15 1:19 ` kuznet
2003-01-15 7:31 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-15 8:16 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-15 9:33 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 1:12 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-16 2:42 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-16 4:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 4:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-16 4:49 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 16:05 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-16 18:15 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-16 18:58 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 23:53 ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-17 1:04 ` Greg KH
2003-01-17 2:27 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-17 21:40 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-13 23:16 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 1:57 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-14 3:44 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 11:16 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 12:04 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-14 12:49 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17 1:59 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-17 10:53 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17 23:31 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-18 12:26 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 13:21 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 13:53 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 14:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-14 18:30 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-14 20:09 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-15 0:12 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-15 0:51 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-15 2:28 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-15 23:20 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-17 17:04 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-17 23:09 ` [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible? Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 1:18 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18 4:54 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-18 7:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18 12:06 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 14:12 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-18 12:45 ` Thomas Molina
2003-02-18 17:22 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19 3:30 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-19 4:11 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19 23:38 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-20 9:46 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-20 0:40 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-20 2:17 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-23 16:02 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-26 23:26 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-27 12:34 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-27 13:20 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-27 14:33 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-23 23:34 ` Kevin O'Connor
2003-02-24 12:14 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 12:35 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-18 14:14 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-02-19 1:48 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-19 2:27 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-01-16 13:44 ` [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface Roman Zippel
2003-01-15 17:04 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030114174911.GA796@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
--to=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®