From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: ext3-users@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 2.4] Fix ext3 scheduling storm and lockup
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 17:05:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030117170516.2e184b82.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
This patch fixes an inefficiency and potential system lockup in the 2.4
kernel's ext3 filesystem. The problem has been present since 2.4.20-pre5.
This patch is applicable to 2.4.20. A copy is at
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ext3-scheduling-storm.patch
Anyone who is using tasks which have realtime scheduling policy on ext3
systems should apply this change.
Details:
At the start of do_get_write_access() we have this logic:
repeat:
lock_buffer(jh->bh);
...
unlock_buffer(jh->bh);
...
if (jh->j_list == BJ_Shadow) {
sleep_on_buffer(jh->bh);
goto repeat;
}
The problem is that the unlock_buffer() will wake up anyone who is sleeping
in the sleep_on_buffer().
So if task A is asleep in sleep_on_buffer() and task B now runs
do_get_write_access(), task B will wake task A by accident. Task B will then
sleep on the buffer and task A will loop, will run unlock_buffer() and then
wake task B.
Net effect: the system does 100,000 context switches/sec until I/O completes
against the buffer and kjournald changes the value of jh->j_list.
Unless task A and task B happen to both have realtime scheduling policy - if
they do then kjournald will never run. The state is never cleared and your
box locks up.
The fix is to not do the `goto repeat;' until the buffer has been taken off
the shadow list. So we don't go and wake up the other waiter(s) until they
can actually proceed to use the buffer.
diff -puN fs/jbd/transaction.c~ext3-scheduling-storm fs/jbd/transaction.c
--- 24/fs/jbd/transaction.c~ext3-scheduling-storm 2003-01-16 02:45:19.000000000 -0800
+++ 24-akpm/fs/jbd/transaction.c 2003-01-16 02:45:19.000000000 -0800
@@ -669,7 +669,8 @@ repeat:
spin_unlock(&journal_datalist_lock);
unlock_journal(journal);
/* commit wakes up all shadow buffers after IO */
- sleep_on(&jh2bh(jh)->b_wait);
+ wait_event(jh2bh(jh)->b_wait,
+ jh->b_jlist != BJ_Shadow);
lock_journal(journal);
goto repeat;
}
_
reply other threads:[~2003-01-18 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030117170516.2e184b82.akpm@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®