From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:25:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:25:48 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:23500 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:25:47 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:24:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030119.222419.37433821.davem@redhat.com> To: wli@holomorphy.com Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask_t From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030120063219.GL780@holomorphy.com> References: <20030119213524.GH780@holomorphy.com> <20030119.221013.65242960.davem@redhat.com> <20030120063219.GL780@holomorphy.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: William Lee Irwin III Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:32:19 -0800 I'll also attempt to get a SPARC toolchain together (as I understand it, there are some divergences from mainline/current gcc/binutils) and do some compiletesting-like and API conversion things there. For sparc64 we use an old CVS egcs snapshot as that is the only thing which builds reliable kernels, especially in 2.5.x