From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:22:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:22:44 -0500 Received: from mta04bw.bigpond.com ([139.134.6.87]:53955 "EHLO mta04bw.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 04:22:43 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan To: Jens Axboe , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: Solved 2.4.21-pre3aa1 and RAID-0 issue (was: Re: 2.4.21-pre3aa1 and RAID0 issue] Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:46:58 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: lkml References: <200212270856.13419.harisri@bigpond.com> <200301271441.11112.harisri@bigpond.com> <20030127113002.GB889@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20030127113002.GB889@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200301282046.58473.harisri@bigpond.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Jens, On Monday 27 January 2003 22:30, Jens Axboe wrote: > Could you please try this patch on top of 2.4.21-pre3aa1 instead of > backing out blk-atomic? Does that work, too? Thanks! Yes, the RAID-0 works fine on 2.4.21-pre3aa1 after applying your patch on top of it. Thanks. -- Hari harisri@bigpond.com