From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH *] use 64 bit jiffies
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:28:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030203082800.GT821@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302030644.h136iXs04935@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 08:42:59AM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On 3 February 2003 00:55, Tim Schmielau wrote:
> > Just a note that I have rediffed for 2.5.55 the patches that use the
> > 64 bit jiffies value to avoid uptime and process start time wrap
> > after 49.5 days. I will push them Linus-wards when he's back.
> > They can be retrieved from
....
> Wow... your patches are STILL not included??
> My 2.4 based server approaches 250 days uptime, it would be a shame
> to be unable to have uptime < 50 days with 2.5
You don't need to have 64-bit jiffy for things like internal
timers, nor for uptime tracking.
Timers have well behaving constructs to use 32-bit jiffy quite
successfully, and 64-bit values, especially atomicish, in 32-bit
register-poor machines (i386) are damn difficult.
I do have a number of machines with 100 to 300 day uptimes, all
with "mere" 32-bit jiffy. With 1000 Hz clock that means at least
one full wrap-around of jiffy.
> --
> vda
/Matti Aarnio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-03 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-02 22:55 Tim Schmielau
2003-02-03 6:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-03 8:28 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
2003-02-03 8:47 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-03 8:55 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-02-04 13:00 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-04 6:41 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-04 8:27 ` Robert de Bath
2003-02-04 8:41 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-02-04 9:29 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-04 13:04 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-17 13:55 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-17 14:02 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-17 14:15 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-02-17 14:23 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-04 17:37 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-02-16 1:37 ` [PATCH] make jiffies wrap 5 min after boot Tim Schmielau
2003-02-16 2:08 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-02-16 2:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-16 2:50 ` Michael Vergoz
2003-02-16 6:37 ` Robert Love
2003-02-16 7:16 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2003-02-16 11:50 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-02-16 12:04 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-11 20:50 ` [patch] jiffies wrap fixes for 2.5.60 Tim Schmielau
2003-02-11 21:31 ` Roger Larsson
2003-02-12 12:09 ` Tim Schmielau
2003-02-05 11:42 ` use 64 bit jiffies broke HZ=100 case (and fix) Oleg Drokin
2003-02-05 12:22 ` Tim Schmielau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030203082800.GT821@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®