From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:37:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:37:48 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:50439 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:37:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 08:47:17 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Greg KH Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 Message-ID: <20030205084717.A16212@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Greg KH , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030205041538.GA16823@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030205041538.GA16823@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:15:38PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:15:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Hi, > > These changesets include some new LSM hooks, all of which have been sent > to lkml with no dissenting comments. Some of these hooks are the same > ones I sent for 2.5.58, but were not picked up. These include hooks for > syslog and sysctl, restores some previously lost hooks, and reworked the > hooks for the security structures for private files. I still don't see the issue of each LSM module having to duplicate the list of sysctls beeing addressed. Coul you please work something out for that before sending it for inclusion?