From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:05:37 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:24083 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:05:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:10:39 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Russell King Subject: Re: [RFC] klibc for 2.5.59 bk Message-ID: <20030207051039.GA30639@kroah.com> References: <20030207045919.GA30526@kroah.com> <3E433EBC.5000202@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E433EBC.5000202@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:06:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >Thanks to Arnd Bergmann, it looks like the klibc and initramfs code is > >now working. I've created a patch against Linus's latest bk tree and > >put it at: > > http://www.kroah.com/linux/klibc/klibc-2.5.59-2.patch.gz > >(I can't get to kernel.org right now, sorry) > >and there's a bk tree at: > > bk://kernel.bkbits.net/gregkh/linux/klibc-2.5 > > > >I'd really like to send this to Linus now, but I'm going to be away > >from email for about a week, so I'll wait will I get back. If anyone > >has any issues with this patch, please let me know. > > > > That's good, that'll give me a chance to check through it. > > What klibc is this based on? klibc-0.72 Ugh, I see you've now released a few versions since then :( I'll sync up to the latest version before sending the patch on to Linus, thanks for making me look. thanks, greg k-h