From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:40:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:40:54 -0500 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:62731 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 06:40:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:50:34 +0000 From: John Levon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Switch APIC (+nmi, +oprofile) to driver model Message-ID: <20030210115034.GF22600@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <200302091407.PAA14076@kim.it.uu.se> <20030210110108.GE2838@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030210110108.GE2838@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Mr. Scruff - Trouser Jazz X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *18iCSI-000E29-00*etZy/tMi.gI* Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 12:01:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Yes, whole oprofile/nmi interaction is ugly like hell. This way it is > at least explicit, so people *know* its ugly. That's no reason not do something like Mikael or I suggested. john