From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SFQ disk scheduler
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:11:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030210151144.GT31401@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030210145001.GT12828@suse.de>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 03:50:01PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a simple stochastic fairness queueing disk scheduler, for current
> 2.5.59-BK. It has known limitations right now, mainly because I didn't
> bother making it complete. But it should suffice for some rudimentary
> testing, at least.
Cool, that was fast! ;)
>
> I'm not going to go into great detail about how it works, see Andrea's
> initial post of the paper referenced. This version may not be completely
> true to the SFQ concept, but should be close enough I think. It divides
> traffic into a fixed number of buckets (64 per default), and perturbs
> the hash every 5 seconds (hash shamelessly borrowed from networking atm,
> see comment).
I tend to think 5 seconds is too small, 30 sec would be better IMHO (it
should be tested at bit).
> To avoid too many disk seeks, when it's time to dispatch requests to the
> driver, we round robin all non-empty buckets and grab a single request
> from each. These requests are sorted into the dispatch queue.
>
> For performance reasons, io scheduler request merging is still a
> per-queue function (and not per-bucket).
Unsure if it worth, but it probably it won't make that much difference,
likely different workloads are working on different part of the disk
anyways.
> In closing, let me stress that this version has not really been tested
> all that much. It passes simple SCSI and IDE testing, should work on any
> hardware basically.
How does it feel?
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-10 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-10 14:50 Jens Axboe
2003-02-10 15:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2003-02-10 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-11 9:06 ` CFQ disk scheduler (was Re: [PATCH] SFQ disk scheduler) Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030210151144.GT31401@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®