From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 06:09:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 06:09:25 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:4868 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 05:51:08 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:38:35 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Rusty trivial patch monkey Russell , kernel list , torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: nmi_int.c: do not use __u8 when there's no need Message-ID: <20030210163835.GA1124@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! Those "__"'s have no right to live, please apply, Pavel --- clean/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c 2003-01-05 22:58:19.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-swsusp/arch/i386/oprofile/nmi_int.c 2003-02-10 17:09:55.000000000 +0100 @@ -217,9 +248,9 @@ int __init nmi_init(struct oprofile_operations ** ops, enum oprofile_cpu * cpu) { - __u8 vendor = current_cpu_data.x86_vendor; - __u8 family = current_cpu_data.x86; - __u8 cpu_model = current_cpu_data.x86_model; + u8 vendor = current_cpu_data.x86_vendor; + u8 family = current_cpu_data.x86; + u8 cpu_model = current_cpu_data.x86_model; if (!cpu_has_apic) return 0; -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?