From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 05:51:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 05:51:00 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:8196 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 05:50:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:13:38 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Rusty trivial patch monkey Russell , kernel list , torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Kill "testing by UNISYS" message Message-ID: <20030210171336.GA10875@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! This kills totally unneccessary and long-obsolete message about testing by UNIFIX and similar obsolete message about NET4.0 for linux2.4... Please apply, Pavel --- clean/init/main.c 2003-01-17 23:13:40.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/init/main.c 2003-01-17 23:19:36.000000000 +0100 @@ -436,7 +436,6 @@ ipc_init(); #endif check_bugs(); - printk("POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX\n"); /* * We count on the initial thread going ok --- clean/net/socket.c 2003-01-09 22:16:36.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/net/socket.c 2003-01-09 22:20:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1784,9 +1784,6 @@ { int i; - printk(KERN_INFO "Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4\n"); - printk(KERN_INFO "Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039\n"); - /* * Initialize all address (protocol) families. */ -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?