From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:14:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:14:36 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:27616 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:14:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:24:18 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Strange TCP with 2.5.60 Message-Id: <20030212102418.3a15b4a8.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <000801c2d28d$376df550$1504a8c0@larry2> References: <000801c2d28d$376df550$1504a8c0@larry2> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2003 18:24:13.0361 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1995A10:01C2D2C3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Kostadin Karaivanov" wrote: > > Trying to use traceroute i get folowing error: > ... > > Networking works....... but command route can't give me the status of > default route: > ... > iptables doesn't work as expected too..... > ... > everything works fine with 2.5.59 and 2.4.20 Could you pelase retest with this patch, and tell us how many of these problems go away? diff -puN net/ipv4/fib_hash.c~a net/ipv4/fib_hash.c --- 25/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c~a 2003-02-12 10:23:55.000000000 -0800 +++ 25-akpm/net/ipv4/fib_hash.c 2003-02-12 10:24:00.000000000 -0800 @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ static __inline__ struct fib_node *fib_g if (!iter->zone) goto out; - if (iter->zone->fz_next) + if (iter->zone->fz_next); break; } _