From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:47:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:47:21 -0500 Received: from 24-216-100-96.charter.com ([24.216.100.96]:387 "EHLO wally.rdlg.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:47:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:57:02 -0500 From: "Robert L. Harris" To: Linux-Kernel Subject: IPv6 in the vanilla tree? Message-ID: <20030213135702.GE4377@rdlg.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linux-Kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P+33d92oIH25kiaB" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --P+33d92oIH25kiaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline For work I'm looking into IPv6 for a big project coming up. There's alot of web pages out etc. From the horses mouth though, what's the state of IPv6 in the 2.4.X (20?) kernel trees? Will it be stable enough in 2.4.21/22 that it won't require usagi patches or will that be in 2.6, etc? Thanks, Robert :wq! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: E344DA3B @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu=20 DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=3Dpack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10)= ;' --P+33d92oIH25kiaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+S6Qu8+1vMONE2jsRArb7AKDCSPfUZTHRAmUrxSHyfh/iw9B88wCg0Sq5 Tmuq9B2wvR/HIt29P7ehbyw= =NSxA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P+33d92oIH25kiaB--