From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [RESEND 6] sysctls for PA-RISC
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:09:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030216190930.B6290@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
Can anyone think why Linus isn't applying this patch? He won't tell
me what's wrong with it, and I'm getting frustrated by the silence.
Add two new sysctls. The first one handles the soft-power switch
and the second describes what to do when we get an unaligned trap.
--- linus-2.5/include/linux/sysctl.h Sun Jan 5 11:03:43 2003
+++ parisc-2.5/include/linux/sysctl.h Sun Jan 5 11:23:43 2003
@@ -129,6 +129,8 @@ enum
KERN_CADPID=54, /* int: PID of the process to notify on CAD */
KERN_PIDMAX=55, /* int: PID # limit */
KERN_CORE_PATTERN=56, /* string: pattern for core-file names */
+ KERN_HPPA_PWRSW=57, /* int: hppa soft-power enable */
+ KERN_HPPA_UNALIGNED=58, /* int: hppa unaligned-trap enable */
};
--- linus-2.5/kernel/sysctl.c Sun Jan 5 11:03:50 2003
+++ parisc-2.5/kernel/sysctl.c Sun Jan 5 11:23:55 2003
@@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ extern char reboot_command [];
extern int stop_a_enabled;
#endif
+#ifdef __hppa__
+extern int pwrsw_enabled;
+extern int unaligned_enabled;
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_S390
#ifdef CONFIG_MATHEMU
extern int sysctl_ieee_emulation_warnings;
@@ -188,6 +193,12 @@ static ctl_table kern_table[] = {
{KERN_SPARC_REBOOT, "reboot-cmd", reboot_command,
256, 0644, NULL, &proc_dostring, &sysctl_string },
{KERN_SPARC_STOP_A, "stop-a", &stop_a_enabled, sizeof (int),
+ 0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
+#endif
+#ifdef __hppa__
+ {KERN_HPPA_PWRSW, "soft-power", &pwrsw_enabled, sizeof (int),
+ 0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
+ {KERN_HPPA_UNALIGNED, "unaligned-trap", &unaligned_enabled, sizeof (int),
0644, NULL, &proc_dointvec},
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_PPC32) && defined(CONFIG_6xx)
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-16 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-16 19:09 Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-02-17 1:42 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-17 11:39 ` Russell King
2003-02-18 7:29 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030216190930.B6290@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®