From: Song Zhao <song.zhao@nuix.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Supermicro X5DL8-GG (ServerWorks Grandchampion LE chipset) slow
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:20:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302210620.21799.song.zhao@nuix.com.au> (raw)
To: Manish Lachwani <manish@Zambeel.com>
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:54 pm, you wrote:
> WHat kind of benchmarks are you running? I had evaluated a Supermicro board
> with e7500 chipset and it showed good performance. Are you benchmarking
> network, memory, disk? Note that 3ware controllers operate at 33 MHZ PCI
> and if the nics share the same PCI bus with 3ware, they too will operate at
> 33 MHZ PCI and not 133 MHZ. Have you disabled hyperthreading in the BIOS?
I did some disk I/O and CPU benchmarks, including bonnie++, hdparm, nbench,
unixbench, dbench, tiotest. I haven't done any network/memory testing yet,
the onboard Broadcom and Intel gigabit controllers both seem to work quite
well. I have taken care to make sure that the 3ware card has its own PCI bus,
in this case slot 5. I have not disabled hyperthreading but I am not sure why
I would.
On that note, I have also done benchmarking with a Supermicro E7500 board
(P4DPR, Intel Gigabit 82544GC onboard controller), the tests I ran included
Netperf, Netperf3, NetPIPE (TCP), Tbench, nttcp, Aim9 and the ones I
mentioned above. It seemed that if I had two identical machines hooked up
directly (back to back with CAT5E crossover cable), the performance would be
a lot better and is very consistent. I tried different combinations
HT=on/off, CPU affinity, IRQ affinity, SMP/UP. Some results were:
Supermicro
=========
Netperf Result (MB/s) - 112.21
Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 112.22
Tbench Result (MB/s) - 114.48
Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 946.55
However, if I hook it up to a different machine, problems started to occur.
For example, with the Tyan S2720 Thunder i7500 board (E7500 chipset, Intel
82544EI onboard gigabit controller), I see good performance on the Tyan but
not Supermicro.
Supermicro
=========
Netperf Result (MB/s) - 29.23
Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 78.19
Tbench Result (MB/s) - 117.32
Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 646.77
Tyan
====
Netperf Result (MB/s) - 112.22
Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 112.02
Tbench Result (MB/s) - can't find it
Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 945.9
-------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-20 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-21 11:20 Song Zhao [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302221437250.2686-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-24 14:28 ` Song Zhao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-21 17:25 Song Zhao
2003-02-21 1:34 Song Zhao
2003-02-20 10:21 ` Jurriaan
2003-02-21 3:01 ` Song Zhao
2003-02-20 12:51 ` Bruce Harada
2003-02-21 11:34 ` Song Zhao
[not found] ` <20030220110616.GA21293@middle.of.nowhere>
2003-02-21 11:39 ` Song Zhao
2003-02-20 14:57 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200302210620.21799.song.zhao@nuix.com.au \
--to=song.zhao@nuix.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®