From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:29:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:29:16 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:42674 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:29:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:36:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Manfred Spraul Cc: fcorneli@elis.rug.ac.be, dan@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace PTRACE_READDATA/WRITEDATA, kernel 2.5.62 Message-Id: <20030225133613.320cf33a.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <3E5BA969.5000905@colorfullife.com> References: <3E5BA969.5000905@colorfullife.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2003 21:39:21.0472 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B8C1000:01C2DD16] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manfred Spraul wrote: > > >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.5/2.5.62/2.5.62-mm3/broken-out/ptrace-flush.patch > >but it's getting fixed I hope. > > > > > This patch seems to be wrong. Yes, it is wrong. I discussed it with davem a while back and he was planning on fixing it up for real. I just keep the patch floating about as a reminder that the thing which it doesn't fix needs fixing. I'll update the changelog...